reviewNutrition in Clinical PracticeMar 2, 2020BRONZE OA

ASPEN Consensus Recommendations for Refeeding Syndrome

Kettering Medical Center · Columbia University Irving Medical Center · +19 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Introduction

In the spring of 2017, the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) Parenteral Nutrition Safety Committee and the Clinical Practice Committee convened an interprofessional task force to develop consensus recommendations for identifying patients with or at risk for refeeding syndrome (RS) and for avoiding and managing the condition. This report provides narrative review and consensus recommendations in hospitalized adult and pediatric populations.

Methods

Because of the variation in definitions and methods reported in the literature, a consensus process was developed. Subgroups of authors investigated specific issues through literature review. Summaries were presented to the entire group for discussion via email and teleconferences. Each section was then compiled into a master document, several revisions of which were reviewed by the committee. FINDINGS/RECOMMENDATIONS: This group proposes a new clinical definition, and criteria for stratifying risk with treatment and screening strategies. The authors propose that RS diagnostic criteria be stratified as follows: a decrease in any 1, 2, or 3 of serum phosphorus, potassium, and/or magnesium levels by 10%-20% (mild), 20%-30% (moderate), or >30% and/or organ dysfunction resulting from a decrease in any of these and/or due to thiamin deficiency (severe), occurring within 5 days of reintroduction of calories.

Citation impact

470
total citations
FWCI
26.51
Percentile
100%
References
125
Citations per year

Authors

17

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Refeeding syndrome
  • Parenteral nutrition
  • Consensus conference
  • Intensive care medicine
  • MEDLINE
  • Enteral administration
  • Incidence (geometry)
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Zero hunger
No related works found for this paper.

Funding