Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better?
Wuhan University · Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
Abstract
Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment is an important step before study initiation usage. Therefore, accurately judging study type is the first priority, and the choosing proper tool is also important. In this review, we introduced methodological quality assessment tools for randomized controlled trial (including individual and cluster), animal study, non-randomized interventional studies (including follow-up study, controlled before-and-after study, before-after/ pre-post study, uncontrolled longitudinal study, interrupted time series study), cohort study, case-control study, cross-sectional study (including analytical and descriptive), observational case series and case reports, comparative…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 145.66
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 121
Authors
6- LMLinlu MaCorresponding
Wuhan University, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
- XWXinghuan Wang
Wuhan University, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
- ZYZhihua Yang
Wuhan University, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
- DHDi Huang
Wuhan University, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
- HWHong Weng
Wuhan University, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
Topics & keywords
- Observational study
- Medicine
- Guideline
- Reliability (semiconductor)
- External validity
- Construct validity
- Internal validity
- Quality (philosophy)