Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention
University of Regina · Massachusetts Institute of Technology · +2 more institutions
Abstract
Across two studies with more than 1,700 U.S. adults recruited online, we present evidence that people share false claims about COVID-19 partly because they simply fail to think sufficiently about whether or not the content is accurate when deciding what to share. In Study 1, participants were far worse at discerning between true and false content when deciding what they would share on social media relative to when they were asked directly about accuracy. Furthermore, greater cognitive reflection and science knowledge were associated with stronger discernment. In Study 2, we found that a simple accuracy reminder at the beginning of the study (i.e., judging the accuracy of a non-COVID-19-related headline) nearly…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 459.64
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 38
Authors
5- GPGordon PennycookCorresponding
University of Regina
- JMJonathon McPhetres
University of Regina, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- YZYunhao Zhang
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- JGJackson G. Lu
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- DGDavid G. Rand
Institute of Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Data & Society Research Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Topics & keywords
- Headline
- Psychology
- Misinformation
- Social media
- Discernment
- Social psychology
- Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
- Social distance