Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease
Cornell University · Stanford University · +49 more institutions
Abstract
Among patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, whether clinical outcomes are better in those who receive an invasive intervention plus medical therapy than in those who receive medical therapy alone is uncertain.
We randomly assigned 5179 patients with moderate or severe ischemia to an initial invasive strategy (angiography and revascularization when feasible) and medical therapy or to an initial conservative strategy of medical therapy alone and angiography if medical therapy failed. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. A key secondary outcome was death from cardiovascular causes or myocardial infarction.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 241.01
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 44
Authors
56- DJDavid J. MaronCorresponding
Cornell University, Stanford University
- JSJudith S. Hochman
Cornell University, New York University, Stanford University
- HRHarmony R. Reynolds
Cornell University, New York University, Stanford University
- SBSripal Bangalore
Cornell University, New York University, Stanford University
- SMSean M. O’Brien
Cornell University, Clinical Research Institute, Stanford University
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Medical therapy
- Coronary disease
- Disease
- Cardiology
- Intensive care medicine
- Intervention (counseling)
- Internal medicine