reviewBMC Medical EducationMar 30, 2020GOLD OA

A systematic review of the factors – enablers and barriers – affecting e-learning in health sciences education

University of Bedfordshire · University of Dundee

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Background

Recently, much attention has been given to e-learning in higher education as it provides better access to learning resources online, utilising technology - regardless of learners' geographical locations and timescale - to enhance learning. It has now become part of the mainstream in education in the health sciences, including medical, dental, public health, nursing, and other allied health professionals. Despite growing evidence claiming that e-learning is as effective as traditional means of learning, there is very limited evidence available about what works, and when and how e-learning enhances teaching and learning. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesise the factors - enablers and barriers - affecting e-learning in health sciences education (el-HSE) that have been reported in the medical literature.

Methods

A systemic review of articles published on e-learning in health sciences education (el-HSE) was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Allied & Complementary Medicine, DH-DATA, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Global Health, from 1980 through 2019, using 'Textword' and 'Thesaurus' search terms. All original articles fulfilling the following criteria were included: (1) e-learning was implemented in health sciences education, and (2) the investigation of the factors - enablers and barriers - about el-HSE related to learning performance or outcomes. Following the PRISMA guidelines, both relevant published and unpublished papers were searched. Data were extracted and quality appraised using QualSyst tools, and synthesised performing thematic analysis.

Citation impact

737
total citations
FWCI
42.45
Percentile
100%
References
94
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • CINAHL
  • PsycINFO
  • Medical education
  • MEDLINE
  • Thematic analysis
  • Scopus
  • Medicine
  • Biomedical sciences
No related works found for this paper.

Funding