Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations
Universidad de Granada · University of Wolverhampton · +1 more institution
Abstract
New sources of citation data have recently become available, such as Microsoft Academic, Dimensions, and the OpenCitations Index of CrossRef open DOI-to-DOI citations (COCI). Although these have been compared to the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS), Scopus, or Google Scholar, there is no systematic evidence of their differences across subject categories. In response, this paper investigates 3,073,351 citations found by these six data sources to 2,515 English-language highly-cited documents published in 2006 from 252 subject categories, expanding and updating the largest previous study. Google Scholar found 88% of all citations, many of which were not found by the other sources, and nearly all citations…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 57.40
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 55
Authors
4- AMAlberto Martín-MartínCorresponding
Universidad de Granada
- MTMike Thelwall
University of Wolverhampton
- EOEnrique Orduna-Malea
Universitat Politècnica de València
- EDEmilio Delgado López-Cózar
Universidad de Granada
Topics & keywords
- Scopus
- Subject (documents)
- Citation
- Web of science
- Webometrics
- Microsoft excel
- Bibliometrics
- Multidisciplinary approach