articleScientometricsSep 21, 2020HYBRID OA

Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations

AMAlberto Martín-MartínMTMike ThelwallEOEnrique Orduna-MaleaEDEmilio Delgado López-Cózar

Universidad de Granada · University of Wolverhampton · +1 more institution

PubMed
Indexed inarxivcrossrefpubmed

Abstract

New sources of citation data have recently become available, such as Microsoft Academic, Dimensions, and the OpenCitations Index of CrossRef open DOI-to-DOI citations (COCI). Although these have been compared to the Web of Science Core Collection (WoS), Scopus, or Google Scholar, there is no systematic evidence of their differences across subject categories. In response, this paper investigates 3,073,351 citations found by these six data sources to 2,515 English-language highly-cited documents published in 2006 from 252 subject categories, expanding and updating the largest previous study. Google Scholar found 88% of all citations, many of which were not found by the other sources, and nearly all citations…

Citation impact

908
total citations
FWCI
57.40
Percentile
100%
References
55
Citations per year

Authors

4
  • AM
    Alberto Martín-MartínCorresponding

    Universidad de Granada

  • MT
    Mike Thelwall

    University of Wolverhampton

  • EO
    Enrique Orduna-Malea

    Universitat Politècnica de València

  • ED
    Emilio Delgado López-Cózar

    Universidad de Granada

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Scopus
  • Subject (documents)
  • Citation
  • Web of science
  • Webometrics
  • Microsoft excel
  • Bibliometrics
  • Multidisciplinary approach
No related works found for this paper.

Funding