Evidence‐based treatment recommendations for neck and low back pain across Europe: A systematic review of guidelines
Aston University · Arthritis UK · +3 more institutions
Abstract
Seventeen CPGs (11 low back; 5 neck; 1 both) from eight European countries were identified, of which seven were high quality. For neck pain, there were consistent weak or moderate strength recommendations for: reassurance, advice and education, manual therapy, referral for exercise therapy/programme, oral analgesics and topical medications, plus psychological therapies or multidisciplinary treatment for specific subgroups. Notable recommendation differences between back and neck pain included, i) analgesics for neck pain (not for back pain); ii) options for back pain-specific subgroups-work-based interventions, return to work advice/programmes and surgical interventions (but not for neck pain) and iii) a greater strength of recommendations (generally moderate or strong) for back pain than those for neck pain.
This review of European CPGs identified a range of mainly non-pharmacological recommended treatment options for NLBP that have broad consensus for use across Europe.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 33.18
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 36
Authors
6- GMGemma MansellCorresponding
Aston University, Arthritis UK, Keele University
- SSSiobhán Stynes
Aston University, Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Arthritis UK, Keele University
- GWGwenllian Wynne‐Jones
Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Arthritis UK, Keele University
- LMLars Morsø
University of Southern Denmark, Arthritis UK, Keele University
- JHJonathan Hill
University of Southern Denmark, Arthritis UK, Keele University
Topics & keywords
- Neck pain
- Systematic review
- Medicine
- Physical therapy
- Alternative medicine
- Physical medicine and rehabilitation
- MEDLINE
- Political science