reviewBMJNov 11, 2020HYBRID OA

Accuracy of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for screening to detect major depression among pregnant and postpartum women: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data

Jewish General Hospital · McGill University · +2 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for screening to detect major depression in pregnant and postpartum women.

Design

Individual participant data meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Medline In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, PsycINFO, and Web of Science (from inception to 3 October 2018). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Eligible datasets included EPDS scores and major depression classification based on validated diagnostic interviews. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis was used to estimate EPDS sensitivity and specificity compared with semi-structured, fully structured (Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) excluded), and MINI diagnostic interviews separately using individual participant data. One stage meta-regression was used to examine accuracy by reference standard categories and participant characteristics.

Citation impact

848
total citations
FWCI
62.39
Percentile
100%
References
42
Citations per year

Authors

5

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
  • Meta-analysis
  • PsycINFO
  • Confidence interval
  • Medicine
  • Postpartum depression
  • Depression (economics)
  • MEDLINE
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding