articleBMJ Global HealthOct 1, 2020GOLD OA

Social media and vaccine hesitancy

Brandeis University · South African Medical Research Council

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Background

Understanding the threat posed by anti-vaccination efforts on social media is critically important with the forth coming need for world wide COVID-19 vaccination programs. We globally evaluate the effect of social media and online foreign disinformation campaigns on vaccination rates and attitudes towards vaccine safety.

Methods

Weuse a large-n cross-country regression framework to evaluate the effect ofsocial media on vaccine hesitancy globally. To do so, we operationalize social media usage in two dimensions: the use of it by the public to organize action(using Digital Society Project indicators), and the level of negative lyoriented discourse about vaccines on social media (using a data set of all geocoded tweets in the world from 2018-2019). In addition, we measure the level of foreign-sourced coordinated disinformation operations on social media ineach country (using Digital Society Project indicators). The outcome of vaccine hesitancy is measured in two ways. First, we use polls of what proportion ofthe public per country feels vaccines are unsafe (using Wellcome Global Monitor indicators for 137 countries). Second, we use annual data of actual vaccination rates from the WHO for 166 countries.

Citation impact

963
total citations
FWCI
81.74
Percentile
100%
References
29
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Social media
  • Public health
  • Medicine
  • Political science
  • Family medicine
  • Nursing
  • Computer science
  • World Wide Web
No related works found for this paper.