Failure to demonstrate efficacy of aducanumab: An analysis of the EMERGE and ENGAGE trials as reported by Biogen, December 2019
Mayo Clinic · Stanford University
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
Aducanumab recently underwent two large phase III clinical trials that were stopped prematurely by the sponsor Biogen. One trial was trending positive while the other showed no benefits from aducanumab. Post hoc analyses led the sponsor to assert that there was a sufficient efficacy signal to justify a new drug application as a treatment for Alzheimer's disease. The sponsor claimed that subsets of participants receiving sufficiently high doses of aducanumab demonstrated benefits in both trials. In contrast, we identified alternative accounts for the apparent drug benefits in post hoc subgroups that are unrelated to dose effects. Biomarker data were consistent with target engagement, but no evidence was…
Citation impact
522
total citations
- FWCI
- 43.36
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 13
Citations per year
Authors
3Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Clinical trial
- Post hoc
- Post-hoc analysis
- Biomarker
- Disease
- Medicine
- Drug trial
- Cognition
UN Sustainable Development Goals
- Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.