Algorithmic Fairness: Choices, Assumptions, and Definitions
Google (United States) · Cornell University · +6 more institutions
Abstract
A recent wave of research has attempted to define fairness quantitatively. In particular, this work has explored what fairness might mean in the context of decisions based on the predictions of statistical and machine learning models. The rapid growth of this new field has led to wildly inconsistent motivations, terminology, and notation, presenting a serious challenge for cataloging and comparing definitions. This article attempts to bring much-needed order. First, we explicate the various choices and assumptions made—often implicitly—to justify the use of prediction-based decision-making. Next, we show how such choices and assumptions can raise fairness concerns and we present a notationally consistent…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 63.90
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 115
Authors
5- SMShira MitchellCorresponding
Google (United States), Cornell University, California University of Pennsylvania, University of Chicago, Microsoft Research (United Kingdom)
- EPEric Potash
Google (United States), Cornell University, California University of Pennsylvania, University of Chicago, Microsoft Research (United Kingdom)
- SBSolon Barocas
Microsoft (United States), Google (United States), Cornell University, University of Chicago, Microsoft Research New York City (United States)
- ADAlexander D’Amour
Google (United States), Cornell University, California University of Pennsylvania, University of Chicago, Microsoft Research (United Kingdom)
- KLKristian Lum
Google (United States), Cornell University, University of Chicago, Microsoft Research (United Kingdom), University of Pennsylvania
Topics & keywords
- Terminology
- Notation
- Computer science
- Management science
- Field (mathematics)
- Order (exchange)
- Operations research
- Data science
- Peace, Justice and strong institutions