Use of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to identify confounders in applied health research: review and recommendations
Turing Institute · University of Leeds · +6 more institutions
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
Background
Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) are an increasingly popular approach for identifying confounding variables that require conditioning when estimating causal effects. This review examined the use of DAGs in applied health research to inform recommendations for improving their transparency and utility in future research.
Methods
Original health research articles published during 1999-2017 mentioning 'directed acyclic graphs' (or similar) or citing DAGitty were identified from Scopus, Web of Science, Medline and Embase. Data were extracted on the reporting of: estimands, DAGs and adjustment sets, alongside the characteristics of each article's largest DAG.
Citation impact
973
total citations
- FWCI
- 81.32
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 39
Citations per year
Authors
13Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Directed acyclic graph
- Confounding
- Interquartile range
- Medicine
- MEDLINE
- Mathematics
- Combinatorics
- Internal medicine
No related works found for this paper.