Retrospective Studies – Utility and Caveats
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
A thorough understanding of the pros and cons of the various study designs is critical to correct interpretation of their results. Retrospective studies are an important tool to study rare diseases, manifestations and outcomes. Findings of these studies can form the basis on which prospective studies are planned. Retrospective studies however have several limitations owing to their design. Since they depend on review of charts that were originally not designed to collect data for research, some information is bound to be missing. Selection and recall biases also affect the results and reasons for differences in treatment between patients and lost follow ups can often not be ascertained and may lead to bias.…
Citation impact
598
total citations
- FWCI
- 29.03
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 23
Citations per year
Authors
2Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Retrospective cohort study
- Interpretation (philosophy)
- Recall
- Computer science
- Medicine
- Psychology
- Cognitive psychology
- Surgery
No related works found for this paper.