articleThe Accounting ReviewMar 1, 2010Closed access

Correcting for Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Dependence in Accounting Research

Stanford University

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

ABSTRACT: We review and evaluate the methods commonly used in the accounting literature to correct for cross-sectional and time-series dependence. While much of the accounting literature studies settings in which variables are cross-sectionally and serially correlated, we find that the extant methods are not robust to both forms of dependence. Contrary to claims in the literature, we find that the Z2 statistic and Newey-West corrected Fama-MacBeth standard errors do not correct for both cross-sectional and time-series dependence. We show that extant methods produce misspecified test statistics in common accounting research settings, and that correcting for both forms of dependence substantially alters…

Citation impact

1,455
total citations
FWCI
265.60
Percentile
100%
References
233
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Extant taxon
  • Econometrics
  • Statistic
  • Economics
  • Accounting research
  • Accounting
  • Equity (law)
  • Statistics
No related works found for this paper.