Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment.
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
One popular justification for punishment is the just deserts rationale: A person deserves punishment proportionate to the moral wrong committed. A competing justification is the deterrence rationale: Punishing an offender reduces the frequency and likelihood of future offenses. The authors examined the motivation underlying laypeople's use of punishment for prototypical wrongs. Study 1 (N = 336) revealed high sensitivity to factors uniquely associated with the just deserts perspective (e.g., offense seriousness, moral trespass) and insensitivity to factors associated with deterrence (e.g., likelihood of detection, offense frequency). Study 2 (N = 329) confirmed the proposed model through structural equation…
Citation impact
915
total citations
- FWCI
- 25.17
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 59
Citations per year
Authors
3Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Seriousness
- Punishment (psychology)
- Trespass
- Deterrence (psychology)
- Psychology
- Social psychology
- Perspective (graphical)
- Criminology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
- Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.