articleJournal of Personality and Social PsychologyAug 1, 2002Closed access

Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment.

Northwestern University

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

One popular justification for punishment is the just deserts rationale: A person deserves punishment proportionate to the moral wrong committed. A competing justification is the deterrence rationale: Punishing an offender reduces the frequency and likelihood of future offenses. The authors examined the motivation underlying laypeople's use of punishment for prototypical wrongs. Study 1 (N = 336) revealed high sensitivity to factors uniquely associated with the just deserts perspective (e.g., offense seriousness, moral trespass) and insensitivity to factors associated with deterrence (e.g., likelihood of detection, offense frequency). Study 2 (N = 329) confirmed the proposed model through structural equation…

Citation impact

915
total citations
FWCI
25.17
Percentile
100%
References
59
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Seriousness
  • Punishment (psychology)
  • Trespass
  • Deterrence (psychology)
  • Psychology
  • Social psychology
  • Perspective (graphical)
  • Criminology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.