articleThe Accounting ReviewJul 1, 2003Closed access

Do Nonaudit Services Compromise Auditor Independence? Further Evidence

University of Wisconsin–Madison

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

This paper challenges the findings of Frankel et al. (2002) (FJN). The results of our discretionary accruals tests differ from FJN's when we adjust discretionary current accruals for firm performance. In our earnings benchmark tests, in contrast to FJN we find no statistically significant association between firms meeting analyst forecasts and auditor fees. Our market reaction tests also provide different results than those reported by FJN. Overall, our study indicates that FJN's results are sensitive to research design choices, and we find no systematic evidence supporting their claim that auditors violate their independence as a result of clients purchasing relatively more nonaudit services.

Citation impact

1,526
total citations
FWCI
83.63
Percentile
100%
References
16
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Accrual
  • Auditor independence
  • Accounting
  • Audit
  • Earnings
  • Business
  • Independence (probability theory)
  • Compromise
No related works found for this paper.