articleThe Accounting ReviewJul 1, 2003Closed access

Subjectivity and the Weighting of Performance Measures: Evidence from a Balanced Scorecard

California University of Pennsylvania

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

This study examines how different types of performance measures were weighted in a subjective balanced scorecard bonus plan adopted by a major financial services firm. Drawing upon economic and psychological studies on performance evaluation and compensation criteria, we develop hypotheses regarding the weights placed on different types of measures. We find that the subjectivity in the scorecard plan allowed superiors to reduce the “balance” in bonus awards by placing most of the weight on financial measures, to incorporate factors other than the scorecard measures in performance evaluations, to change evaluation criteria from quarter to quarter, to ignore measures that were predictive of future financial…

Citation impact

884
total citations
FWCI
38.03
Percentile
100%
References
44
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Balanced scorecard
  • Subjectivity
  • Weighting
  • Revenue
  • Actuarial science
  • Performance measurement
  • Quarter (Canadian coin)
  • Accounting
No related works found for this paper.