What's My Line? A Comparison of Industry Classification Schemes for Capital Market Research
Cornell University · American Standard (United States) · +1 more institution
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study compares four broadly available industry classification schemes in a variety of applications common to capital market research. Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) codes have been available since 1939 but are being replaced by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes. The Global Industry Classifications Standard (GICS) SM system, jointly developed by Standard & Poor's and Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI), is popular among financial practitioners, whereas the Fama and French [1997] algorithm is used primarily by academics. Our results show that GICS classifications are significantly better at explaining stock return comovements, as well as…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 13.78
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 18
Authors
3- SBSanjeev BhojrajCorresponding
Cornell University, American Standard (United States), Thomson Reuters (United States)
- CMCharles M.C. Lee
Cornell University, American Standard (United States), Thomson Reuters (United States)
- DODerek Oler
Cornell University, American Standard (United States), Thomson Reuters (United States)
Topics & keywords
- Valuation (finance)
- Economics
- Capital market
- Stock (firearms)
- Classification scheme
- Econometrics
- Capital (architecture)
- Business