reviewBMJ OpenFeb 1, 2022GOLD OA

Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 381 studies (the meta-TENS study)

Leeds Beckett University · Airedale NHS Foundation Trust · +2 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for relief of pain in adults.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Cochrane Central, Embase (and others) from inception to July 2019 and updated on 17 May 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing strong non-painful TENS at or close to the site of pain versus placebo or other treatments in adults with pain, irrespective of diagnosis. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: 50%) during or immediately after TENS. Random effect models were used to calculate standardised mean differences (SMD) and risk ratios. Subgroup analyses were related to trial methodology and characteristics of pain.

Citation impact

253
total citations
FWCI
50.37
Percentile
100%
References
38
Citations per year

Authors

5

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
  • Meta-analysis
  • Chronic pain
  • Physical therapy
  • Systematic review
  • Physical medicine and rehabilitation
  • MEDLINE
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.

Funding