articleJournal of Public HealthFeb 24, 2022HYBRID OA

Strengthening systematic reviews in public health: guidance in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2nd edition

Cochrane · University of Newcastle Australia · +5 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Aims

Decision makers in public health practice and policy rely on access to trustworthy, relevant, synthesized evidence. The second edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions ('the Handbook') reflects a major revision in guidance for authors of systematic reviews, incorporating a decade of methodological development and a number of significant changes to previous recommendations. This paper aims to highlight new guidance that addresses a number of key methodological challenges for authors of systematic reviews in public health.

Results

The revised Handbook includes guidance on framing public health research questions for synthesis, considering equity, intervention complexity, risk of bias assessment and synthesis methods other than meta-analysis. Reviews of public health interventions frequently encounter the types of methodological complexity addressed in this new guidance.

Citation impact

417
total citations
FWCI
68.58
Percentile
100%
References
24
Citations per year

Authors

4

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Systematic review
  • Psychological intervention
  • Medicine
  • Public health
  • Cochrane collaboration
  • Alternative medicine
  • Family medicine
  • MEDLINE
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.