articleJBI Evidence SynthesisMar 4, 2022GREEN OA

What are scoping reviews? Providing a formal definition of scoping reviews as a type of evidence synthesis

ZMZachary MunnDPDanielle PollockHKHanan KhalilLALyndsay AlexanderPMPatricia Mclnerney

The University of Adelaide · La Trobe University · +8 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Evidence synthesis encompasses a broad range of review types, and scoping reviews are an increasingly popular approach to synthesizing evidence in a number of fields. They sit alongside other evidence synthesis methodologies, such as systematic reviews, qualitative evidence synthesis, realist synthesis, and many more. Until now, scoping reviews have been variously defined in the literature. In this article, we provide the following formal definition for scoping reviews: Scoping reviews are a type of evidence synthesis that aims to systematically identify and map the breadth of evidence available on a particular topic, field, concept, or issue, often irrespective of source (ie, primary research,…

Citation impact

600
total citations
FWCI
95.66
Percentile
100%
References
11
Citations per year

Authors

8
  • ZM
    Zachary MunnCorresponding

    The University of Adelaide

  • DP
    Danielle Pollock

    The University of Adelaide

  • HK
    Hanan Khalil

    La Trobe University

  • LA
    Lyndsay Alexander

    Robert Gordon University

  • PM
    Patricia Mclnerney

    University of the Witwatersrand

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Systematic review
  • Key (lock)
  • Empirical evidence
  • Formal concept analysis
  • Identification (biology)
  • Context (archaeology)
No related works found for this paper.