Reporting standards for psychological network analyses in cross-sectional data.
University Medical Center Groningen · University of Groningen · +2 more institutions
Indexed incrossrefpubmed
Abstract
In a scientific report. A lack of such reporting standards may foster researcher degrees of freedom and could provide fertile ground for questionable reporting practices. Here, we introduce reporting standards for network analyses in cross-sectional data, along with a tutorial and two examples. The presented guidelines are aimed at researchers as well as the broader scientific community, such as reviewers and journal editors evaluating scientific work. We conclude by discussing how the network literature specifically can benefit from such guidelines for reporting and transparency. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Citation impact
445
total citations
- FWCI
- 71.08
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 77
Citations per year
Authors
9Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- PsycINFO
- Popularity
- Transparency (behavior)
- Computer science
- Data science
- Dependency (UML)
- Psychology
- MEDLINE
UN Sustainable Development Goals
- Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.