The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Queen's University · Monash University · +31 more institutions
Abstract
Background: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did and what they found. Over the last decade, there have been many advances in systematic review methodology and terminology, which have necessitated an update to the guideline.Objectives: To develop the PRISMA 2020 statement for reporting systematic reviews.Methods: We reviewed 60 documents with reporting guidance for systematic reviews to generate suggested modifications to the PRISMA 2009 statement. We sought feedback on the suggested modifications through an online survey of 110…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 463.96
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 60
Authors
26- MJMatthew J. PageCorresponding
Queen's University, Monash University
- JEJoanne E. McKenzie
Monash University
- PMPatrick M. Bossuyt
Monash University, University of Amsterdam
- IBIsabelle Boutron
Inserm, Université Paris Cité, Institut de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences de Paris, Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique
- THTammy Hoffmann
Bond University
Topics & keywords
- Checklist
- Systematic review
- Guideline
- Terminology
- Statement (logic)
- Presentation (obstetrics)
- MEDLINE
- Computer science
Funding
- NINational Institute for Health and Care ResearchAward: DRF-2018-11-ST2-048
- OHOttawa Hospital Anesthesia Alternate Funds Association
- NINational Institutes of HealthAward: UG1EY020522
- MRMedical Research Council
- NHNational Health and Medical Research CouncilAwards: 1088535, 1154607, 1143429
- NENational Eye InstituteAward: UG1EY020522