PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
Queen's University · Endangered Language Fund · +31 more institutions
Abstract
The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was developed to facilitate transparent and complete reporting of systematic reviews and has been updated (to PRISMA 2020) to reflect recent advances in systematic review methodology and terminology. Here, we present the explanation and elaboration paper for PRISMA 2020, where we explain why reporting of each item is recommended, present bullet points that detail the reporting recommendations, and present exemplars from published reviews. We hope that…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 93.62
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 157
Authors
26- MJMatthew J. PageCorresponding
Queen's University, Endangered Language Fund, Monash University
- DMDavid Moher
Monash University
- PMPatrick M. Bossuyt
University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Amsterdam
- IBIsabelle Boutron
Inserm, Université Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique
- THTammy Hoffmann
Bond University
Topics & keywords
- Systematic review
- Terminology
- Elaboration
- Guideline
- Psychology
- Computer science
- Management science
- MEDLINE
- Partnerships for the goals