Reliability in Content Analysis: Some Common Misconceptions and Recommendations
Indexed incrossref
Abstract
In a recent article published in this journal, Lombard, Snyder-Duch, and Bracken (2002) surveyed 200 content analyses for their reporting of reliability tests; compared the virtues and drawbacks of five popular reliability measures; and proposed guidelines and standards for their use. Their discussion revealed that numerous misconceptions circulate in the content analysis literature regarding how these measures behave and can aid or deceive content analysts in their effort to ensure the reliability of their data. This paper proposes three conditions for statistical measures to serve as indices of the reliability of data and examines the mathematical structure and the behavior of the five coefficients discussed…
Citation impact
1,006
total citations
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 0
Citations per year
Authors
1Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Psychology
- Content analysis
- Reliability (semiconductor)
- Content (measure theory)
- Social psychology
- Sociology
- Social science
No related works found for this paper.