articlePsychological MethodsJun 23, 2022HYBRID OA

Effect size guidelines for cross-lagged effects.

UOUlrich OrthLLLaurenz L. MeierJLJanina Larissa BühlerLCLaura C. DappSKSamantha Krauss

University of Bern · Victoria School of Management · +4 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Cross-lagged models are by far the most commonly used method to test the prospective effect of one construct on another, yet there are no guidelines for interpreting the size of cross-lagged effects. This research aims to establish empirical benchmarks for cross-lagged effects, focusing on the cross-lagged panel model (CLPM) and the random intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM). We drew a quasirepresentative sample of studies published in four subfields of psychology (i.e., developmental, social-personality, clinical, and industrial-organizational). The dataset included 1,028 effect sizes for the CLPM and 302 effect sizes for the RI-CLPM, based on data from 174 samples. For the CLPM, the 25th, 50th, and…

Citation impact

601
total citations
FWCI
85.14
Percentile
100%
References
49
Citations per year

Authors

7

Topics & keywords

Topics
Keywords
  • Statistics
  • Psychology
  • Econometrics
  • Social psychology
  • Mathematics
No related works found for this paper.

Funding