The i-frame and the s-frame: How focusing on individual-level solutions has led behavioral public policy astray
University of Warwick · Decision Sciences (United States) · +1 more institution
Abstract
An influential line of thinking in behavioral science, to which the two authors have long subscribed, is that many of society's most pressing problems can be addressed cheaply and effectively at the level of the individual, without modifying the system in which the individual operates. We now believe this was a mistake, along with, we suspect, many colleagues in both the academic and policy communities. Results from such interventions have been disappointingly modest. But more importantly, they have guided many (though by no means all) behavioral scientists to frame policy problems in individual, not systemic, terms: To adopt what we call the "i-frame," rather than the "s-frame." The difference may be more…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 68.60
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 297
Authors
2Topics & keywords
- Mistake
- Frame (networking)
- Suspect
- Argument (complex analysis)
- Action (physics)
- Law and economics
- Nudge theory
- Public policy
- Climate action