articleJBI Evidence SynthesisSep 9, 2022GREEN OA

Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews

The University of Adelaide · University of South Australia · +14 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Scoping reviewers often face challenges in the extraction, analysis, and presentation of scoping review results. Using best-practice examples and drawing on the expertise of the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group and an editor of a journal that publishes scoping reviews, this paper expands on existing JBI scoping review guidance. The aim of this article is to clarify the process of extracting data from different sources of evidence; discuss what data should be extracted (and what should not); outline how to analyze extracted data, including an explanation of basic qualitative content analysis; and offer suggestions for the presentation of results in scoping reviews.

Citation impact

1,645
total citations
FWCI
244.89
Percentile
100%
References
32
Citations per year

Authors

13

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Presentation (obstetrics)
  • Data extraction
  • Best practice
  • Computer science
  • Data science
  • Systematic review
  • Process (computing)
  • Management science
No related works found for this paper.