Reflections on 10 years of effectiveness-implementation hybrid studies
Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System · University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · +5 more institutions
Abstract
This article provides new reflections and recommendations from authors of the initial effectiveness-implementation hybrid study manuscript and additional experts in their conceptualization and application. Given the widespread and continued use of hybrid studies, critical appraisals are necessary. The article offers reflections across five conceptual and methodological areas. It begins with the recommendation to replace the term “design” in favor of “study.” The use of the term “design” and the explicit focus on trial methodology in the original paper created confusion. The essence of hybrid studies is combining research questions concerning intervention effectiveness and implementation within the same study,…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 69.70
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 52
Authors
8- GMGeoffrey M. Curran
Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
- SJSara J. LandesCorresponding
Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Quality Enhancement Research Initiative, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
- SASacha A. McBain
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
- JMJeffrey M. Pyne
Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
- JDJustin D. Smith
University of Utah
Topics & keywords
- Typology
- Computer science
- Conceptualization
- Management science
- Stakeholder
- Focus (optics)
- Confusion
- Engineering ethics
Funding
- UDU.S. Department of Veterans AffairsAwards: 20-026, QUE 20-026
- NINational Institutes of HealthAward: UL1 TR003107
- QEQuality Enhancement Research InitiativeAwards: QUE 20-026, PII 19-462
- NHNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
- NCNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesAwards: TR003107, UL1 TR003107