Barriers and enablers to implementing clinical practice guidelines in primary care: an overview of systematic reviews
Charles Darwin University · Queensland University of Technology
Abstract
To identify the barriers and enablers to implementing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommendations in primary care and to provide recommendations that could facilitate the uptake of CPGs recommendations.
An overview of systematic reviews. DATA SOURCES: Nine electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Journals @Ovid Full Text, EMBase, JBI) and three online data sources for guidelines (Turning Research Into Practice, the National Guideline Clearinghouse and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) were searched until May 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Systematic reviews, meta-analyses or other types of systematic synthesis of quantitative, qualitative or mixed-methods studies on the topic of barriers and/or enablers for CPGs implementation in primary care were included. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two authors independently screened the studies and extracted the data using a predesigned data extraction form. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised by using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses. Content analysis was used to synthesise the data.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 61.15
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 46
Authors
4Topics & keywords
- CINAHL
- Systematic review
- PsycINFO
- Data extraction
- Medicine
- MEDLINE
- Checklist
- Cochrane Library