reviewThe LancetFeb 16, 2023HYBRID OA

Past SARS-CoV-2 infection protection against re-infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Understanding the level and characteristics of protection from past SARS-CoV-2 infection against subsequent re-infection, symptomatic COVID-19 disease, and severe disease is essential for predicting future potential disease burden, for designing policies that restrict travel or access to venues where there is a high risk of transmission, and for informing choices about when to receive vaccine doses. We aimed to systematically synthesise studies to estimate protection from past infection by variant, and where data allow, by time since infection.

Methods

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we identified, reviewed, and extracted from the scientific literature retrospective and prospective cohort studies and test-negative case-control studies published from inception up to Sept 31, 2022, that estimated the reduction in risk of COVID-19 among individuals with a past SARS-CoV-2 infection in comparison to those without a previous infection. We meta-analysed the effectiveness of past infection by outcome (infection, symptomatic disease, and severe disease), variant, and time since infection. We ran a Bayesian meta-regression to estimate the pooled estimates of protection. Risk-of-bias assessment was evaluated using the National Institutes of Health quality-assessment tools. The systematic review was PRISMA compliant and was registered with PROSPERO (number CRD42022303850).

Citation impact

456
total citations
FWCI
85.51
Percentile
100%
References
55
Citations per year

Authors

26

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Meta-analysis
  • Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
  • Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
  • 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak
  • Virology
  • Betacoronavirus
  • Medicine
  • Coronavirus Infections
No related works found for this paper.