reviewACM Computing SurveysFeb 24, 2023HYBRID OA

From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AI

University of Duisburg-Essen · University of Twente

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

The rising popularity of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to understand high-performing black boxes raised the question of how to evaluate explanations of machine learning (ML) models. While interpretability and explainability are often presented as a subjectively validated binary property, we consider it a multi-faceted concept. We identify 12 conceptual properties, such as Compactness and Correctness, that should be evaluated for comprehensively assessing the quality of an explanation. Our so-called Co-12 properties serve as categorization scheme for systematically reviewing the evaluation practices of more than 300 papers published in the past 7 years at major AI and ML conferences that introduce…

Citation impact

458
total citations
FWCI
74.23
Percentile
100%
References
211
Citations per year

Authors

9

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Computer science
  • Interpretability
  • Popularity
  • Categorization
  • Benchmark (surveying)
  • Correctness
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Systematic review
No related works found for this paper.