articleJAMA SurgeryMar 15, 2023GREEN OA

Five-Year Survival Outcomes of Laparoscopy-Assisted vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer

Oita University · Kurume University · +15 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Importance

Evidence of implementation of laparoscopic gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer is currently insufficient, as the primary end point in previous prospective studies was evaluated at a median follow-up time of 3 years. More robust evidence is necessary to verify noninferiority of laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Objective

To compare 5-year survival outcomes between laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a multicenter, open-label, noninferiority, prospective randomized clinical trial. Between November 26, 2009, and July 29, 2016, eligible patients with histologically proven gastric carcinoma from 37 institutes in Japan were enrolled. Two interim analyses and final analysis were performed in October 2014, May 2018, and November 2021, respectively. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the ODG or LADG group. The procedures were performed exclusively by qualified surgeons. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was 5-year relapse-free survival, and the noninferiority margin for the hazard ratio (HR) was set at 1.31. The secondary end points were 5-year overall survival and safety.

Citation impact

181
total citations
FWCI
43.80
Percentile
100%
References
33
Citations per year

Authors

44

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Laparoscopy
  • Interim analysis
  • Hazard ratio
  • Gastrectomy
  • Clinical endpoint
  • Surgery
  • Cancer
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.