preprintApr 28, 2023Closed access

Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speech

Indiana University Bloomington

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Recent studies have alarmed that many online hate speeches are implicit. With its subtle nature, the explainability of the detection of such hateful speech has been a challenging problem. In this work, we examine whether ChatGPT can be used for providing natural language explanations (NLEs) for implicit hateful speech detection. We design our prompt to elicit concise ChatGPT-generated NLEs and conduct user studies to evaluate their qualities by comparison with human-written NLEs. We discuss the potential and limitations of ChatGPT in the context of implicit hateful speech research.

Citation impact

205
total citations
FWCI
34.19
Percentile
100%
References
6
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Context (archaeology)
  • Computer science
  • Natural (archaeology)
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Cognitive science
  • Psychology
  • Natural language processing
  • History
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.