preprintApr 28, 2023Closed access
Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speech
Indiana University Bloomington
Indexed incrossref
Abstract
Recent studies have alarmed that many online hate speeches are implicit. With its subtle nature, the explainability of the detection of such hateful speech has been a challenging problem. In this work, we examine whether ChatGPT can be used for providing natural language explanations (NLEs) for implicit hateful speech detection. We design our prompt to elicit concise ChatGPT-generated NLEs and conduct user studies to evaluate their qualities by comparison with human-written NLEs. We discuss the potential and limitations of ChatGPT in the context of implicit hateful speech research.
Citation impact
205
total citations
- FWCI
- 34.19
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 6
Citations per year
Authors
3Topics & keywords
Keywords
- Context (archaeology)
- Computer science
- Natural (archaeology)
- Cognitive psychology
- Cognitive science
- Psychology
- Natural language processing
- History
UN Sustainable Development Goals
- Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.