articleNatureApr 5, 2023HYBRID OA

Blinded, randomized trial of sonographer versus AI cardiac function assessment

Palo Alto University · Stanford University · +3 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

, although it has not yet been tested with blinding and randomization. Here we designed a blinded, randomized non-inferiority clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05140642; no outside funding) of AI versus sonographer initial assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to evaluate the impact of AI in the interpretation workflow. The primary end point was the change in the LVEF between initial AI or sonographer assessment and final cardiologist assessment, evaluated by the proportion of studies with substantial change (more than 5% change). From 3,769 echocardiographic studies screened, 274 studies were excluded owing to poor image quality. The proportion of studies substantially changed was…

Citation impact

224
total citations
FWCI
47.49
Percentile
100%
References
36
Citations per year

Authors

16

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Sonographer
  • Blinding
  • Medicine
  • Confidence interval
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Randomization
  • Ejection fraction
  • Internal medicine
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • No poverty
No related works found for this paper.

Funding