articleProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionApr 14, 2023Closed access

Explanations Can Reduce Overreliance on AI Systems During Decision-Making

Stanford University · University of Washington

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Prior work has identified a resilient phenomenon that threatens the performance of human-AI decision-making teams: overreliance, when people agree with an AI, even when it is incorrect. Surprisingly, overreliance does not reduce when the AI produces explanations for its predictions, compared to only providing predictions. Some have argued that overreliance results from cognitive biases or uncalibrated trust, attributing overreliance to an inevitability of human cognition. By contrast, our paper argues that people strategically choose whether or not to engage with an AI explanation, demonstrating empirically that there are scenarios where AI explanations reduce overreliance. To achieve this, we formalize this…

Citation impact

277
total citations
FWCI
45.73
Percentile
100%
References
70
Citations per year

Authors

6

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Task (project management)
  • Temporal discounting
  • Cognition
  • Discounting
  • Affect (linguistics)
  • Risk analysis (engineering)
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Psychology
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Peace, Justice and strong institutions
No related works found for this paper.

Funding