Explanations Can Reduce Overreliance on AI Systems During Decision-Making
Stanford University · University of Washington
Abstract
Prior work has identified a resilient phenomenon that threatens the performance of human-AI decision-making teams: overreliance, when people agree with an AI, even when it is incorrect. Surprisingly, overreliance does not reduce when the AI produces explanations for its predictions, compared to only providing predictions. Some have argued that overreliance results from cognitive biases or uncalibrated trust, attributing overreliance to an inevitability of human cognition. By contrast, our paper argues that people strategically choose whether or not to engage with an AI explanation, demonstrating empirically that there are scenarios where AI explanations reduce overreliance. To achieve this, we formalize this…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 45.73
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 70
Authors
6Topics & keywords
- Task (project management)
- Temporal discounting
- Cognition
- Discounting
- Affect (linguistics)
- Risk analysis (engineering)
- Cognitive psychology
- Psychology
- Peace, Justice and strong institutions