Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults
Hennepin County Medical Center · Pulmonary and Allergy Associates · +19 more institutions
Abstract
Whether video laryngoscopy as compared with direct laryngoscopy increases the likelihood of successful tracheal intubation on the first attempt among critically ill adults is uncertain.
In a multicenter, randomized trial conducted at 17 emergency departments and intensive care units (ICUs), we randomly assigned critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation to the video-laryngoscope group or the direct-laryngoscope group. The primary outcome was successful intubation on the first attempt. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of severe complications during intubation; severe complications were defined as severe hypoxemia, severe hypotension, new or increased vasopressor use, cardiac arrest, or death.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 95.90
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 45
Authors
44- MEMatthew E. PrekkerCorresponding
Hennepin County Medical Center, Pulmonary and Allergy Associates
- BEBrian E. Driver
Hennepin County Medical Center
- SAStacy A. Trent
Hennepin County Medical Center
- DRDaniel Resnick‐Ault
Hennepin County Medical Center
- KPKevin P. Seitz
Hennepin County Medical Center, University of Colorado Denver
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Intubation
- Laryngoscopy
- Anesthesia
- Tracheal intubation
- Interim analysis
- Intensive care
- Hypoxemia
- Good health and well-being