New approach methodologies in human regulatory toxicology – Not if, but how and when!
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment · National Research Council · +24 more institutions
Abstract
The predominantly animal-centric approach of chemical safety assessment has increasingly come under pressure. Society is questioning overall performance, sustainability, continued relevance for human health risk assessment and ethics of this system, demanding a change of paradigm. At the same time, the scientific toolbox used for risk assessment is continuously enriched by the development of "New Approach Methodologies" (NAMs). While this term does not define the age or the state of readiness of the innovation, it covers a wide range of methods, including quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) predictions, high-throughput screening (HTS) bioassays, omics applications, cell cultures, organoids,…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 89.63
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 145
Authors
29- SSSebastian SchmeisserCorresponding
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment
- AMAndrea Miccoli
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, National Research Council
- MVMartin von Bergen�
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research, Leipzig University
- EBElisabet Berggren
Joint Research Centre
- ABAlbert Braeuning
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment
Topics & keywords
- Toolbox
- Context (archaeology)
- Risk assessment
- Relevance (law)
- Hazard
- Risk analysis (engineering)
- Computer science
- Data science
Funding
- UEU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- WHWorld Health Organization
- EFEuropean Food Safety Authority
- UDUniversität des Saarlandes
- NINational Institutes of Health
- UFU.S. Food and Drug Administration
- HCHealth Canada
- DFDirectorate-General for the Environment
- JRJoint Research Centre
- NCNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences