articleOne EarthJul 1, 2023HYBRID OA

The cost of direct air capture and storage can be reduced via strategic deployment but is unlikely to fall below stated cost targets

Heriot-Watt University · University of Pennsylvania

Indexed incrossref

Abstract

Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is necessary to minimize the impact of climate change by tackling hard-toabate sectors and historical emissions. Direct air capture and storage (DACS) is an important CDR technology, but it remains unclear when and how DACS can be economically viable. Here, we use a bottom-up engineering-economic model together with top-down technological learning projections to calculate plant-level cost trajectories for four DACS technologies. Our analysis demonstrates that the costs of these technologies can plateau by 2050 at around $\$$100-600 t-CO2-1 mainly via capital cost reduction through aggressive deployment, but still exceed the optimistic targets defined by countries such as the US…

Citation impact

181
total citations
FWCI
99.86
Percentile
100%
References
69
Citations per year

Authors

12

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Software deployment
  • Carbon capture and storage (timeline)
  • Capital cost
  • Work (physics)
  • Scale (ratio)
  • Environmental economics
  • Cost reduction
  • Opportunity cost
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Climate action
No related works found for this paper.

Funding