articleProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJul 18, 2023HYBRID OA

ChatGPT outperforms crowd workers for text-annotation tasks

University of Zurich · Harvard University Press

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdatacitepubmed

Abstract

Many NLP applications require manual text annotations for a variety of tasks, notably to train classifiers or evaluate the performance of unsupervised models. Depending on the size and degree of complexity, the tasks may be conducted by crowd workers on platforms such as MTurk as well as trained annotators, such as research assistants. Using four samples of tweets and news articles ( n = 6,183), we show that ChatGPT outperforms crowd workers for several annotation tasks, including relevance, stance, topics, and frame detection. Across the four datasets, the zero-shot accuracy of ChatGPT exceeds that of crowd workers by about 25 percentage points on average, while ChatGPT’s intercoder agreement exceeds that of…

Citation impact

897
total citations
FWCI
147.79
Percentile
100%
References
12
Citations per year

Authors

3

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Computer science
  • Annotation
  • Variety (cybernetics)
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Crowdsourcing
  • Relevance (law)
  • Frame (networking)
  • Natural language processing
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Quality Education
No related works found for this paper.

Funding