reviewImplementation ScienceJul 25, 2023GOLD OA

Ten years of implementation outcomes research: a scoping review

Washington University in St. Louis · The Ohio State University · +2 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Background

Proctor and colleagues' 2011 paper proposed a taxonomy of eight implementation outcomes and challenged the field to address a research agenda focused on conceptualization, measurement, and theory building. Ten years later, this paper maps the field's progress in implementation outcomes research. This scoping review describes how each implementation outcome has been studied, research designs and methods used, and the contexts and settings represented in the current literature. We also describe the role of implementation outcomes in relation to implementation strategies and other outcomes.

Methods

Arksey and O'Malley's framework for conducting scoping reviews guided our methods. Using forward citation tracing, we identified all literature citing the 2011 paper. We conducted our search in the Web of Science (WOS) database and added citation alerts sent to the first author from the publisher for a 6-month period coinciding with the WOS citation search. This produced 1346 titles and abstracts. Initial abstract screening yielded 480 manuscripts, and full-text review yielded 400 manuscripts that met inclusion criteria (empirical assessment of at least one implementation outcome).

Citation impact

354
total citations
FWCI
154.60
Percentile
100%
References
70
Citations per year

Authors

7

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Citation
  • Conceptualization
  • Health informatics
  • Health services research
  • Medicine
  • Systematic review
  • Fidelity
  • Observational study
No related works found for this paper.

Funding