Balancing risks and benefits of cannabis use: umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and observational studies
University of Ottawa · King's College London · +37 more institutions
Abstract
To systematically assess credibility and certainty of associations between cannabis, cannabinoids, and cannabis based medicines and human health, from observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
Umbrella review. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, PsychInfo, Embase, up to 9 February 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Systematic reviews with meta-analyses of observational studies and RCTs that have reported on the efficacy and safety of cannabis, cannabinoids, or cannabis based medicines were included. Credibility was graded according to convincing, highly suggestive, suggestive, weak, or not significant (observational evidence), and by GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) (RCTs). Quality was assessed with AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2). Sensitivity analyses were conducted.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 53.84
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 164
Authors
32- MSMarco SolmiCorresponding
University of Ottawa, King's College London, Ottawa Hospital, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, University of Southampton, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
- MDMarco De Toffol
Ospedale Veris Delli Ponti Scorrano
- JYJong Yeob Kim
Yonsei University
- MCMin Choi
Yonsei University
- BSBrendon Stubbs
King's College London, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Observational study
- Cannabis
- Adverse effect
- Randomized controlled trial
- Systematic review
- Cannabidiol
- Confidence interval
- Good health and well-being