Comparison of ChatGPT–3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Orthopaedic Resident Performance on Orthopaedic Assessment Examinations
Louisiana State University in Shreveport · Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) programs have the ability to answer complex queries including medical profession examination questions. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of orthopaedic residents (ortho residents) against Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT)-3.5 and GPT-4 on orthopaedic assessment examinations. A secondary objective was to perform a subgroup analysis comparing the performance of each group on questions that included image interpretation versus text-only questions.
The ResStudy orthopaedic examination question bank was used as the primary source of questions. One hundred eighty questions and answer choices from nine different orthopaedic subspecialties were directly input into ChatGPT-3.5 and then GPT-4. ChatGPT did not have consistently available image interpretation, so no images were directly provided to either AI format. Answers were recorded as correct versus incorrect by the chatbot, and resident performance was recorded based on user data provided by ResStudy.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 7.00
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 21
Authors
3- PAPatrick A. MasseyCorresponding
Louisiana State University in Shreveport, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport
- CMCarver Montgomery
Louisiana State University in Shreveport, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport
- ASAndrew S. Zhang
Louisiana State University in Shreveport, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Subgroup analysis
- Interpretation (philosophy)
- Orthopedic surgery
- Medical physics
- Surgery
- Internal medicine
- Meta-analysis
- Quality Education