articleScientific ReportsSep 7, 2023GOLD OA

Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT

Manhattan University · The Graduate Center, CUNY · +2 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed

Abstract

Although chatbots such as ChatGPT can facilitate cost-effective text generation and editing, factually incorrect responses (hallucinations) limit their utility. This study evaluates one particular type of hallucination: fabricated bibliographic citations that do not represent actual scholarly works. We used ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 to produce short literature reviews on 42 multidisciplinary topics, compiling data on the 636 bibliographic citations (references) found in the 84 papers. We then searched multiple databases and websites to determine the prevalence of fabricated citations, to identify errors in the citations to non-fabricated papers, and to evaluate adherence to APA citation format. Within this set…

Citation impact

337
total citations
FWCI
12.11
Percentile
100%
References
31
Citations per year

Authors

2

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Citation
  • Computer science
  • Information retrieval
  • Set (abstract data type)
  • Limit (mathematics)
  • MEDLINE
  • Multidisciplinary approach
  • Data science
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Quality Education
No related works found for this paper.