Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT
Manhattan University · The Graduate Center, CUNY · +2 more institutions
Abstract
Although chatbots such as ChatGPT can facilitate cost-effective text generation and editing, factually incorrect responses (hallucinations) limit their utility. This study evaluates one particular type of hallucination: fabricated bibliographic citations that do not represent actual scholarly works. We used ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 to produce short literature reviews on 42 multidisciplinary topics, compiling data on the 636 bibliographic citations (references) found in the 84 papers. We then searched multiple databases and websites to determine the prevalence of fabricated citations, to identify errors in the citations to non-fabricated papers, and to evaluate adherence to APA citation format. Within this set…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 12.11
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 31
Authors
2Topics & keywords
- Citation
- Computer science
- Information retrieval
- Set (abstract data type)
- Limit (mathematics)
- MEDLINE
- Multidisciplinary approach
- Data science
- Quality Education