Practical advice on variable selection and reporting using Akaike information criterion
University of St Andrews · Cornell University · +4 more institutions
Abstract
The various debates around model selection paradigms are important, but in lieu of a consensus, there is a demonstrable need for a deeper appreciation of existing approaches, at least among the end-users of statistics and model selection tools. In the ecological literature, the Akaike information criterion (AIC) dominates model selection practices, and while it is a relatively straightforward concept, there exists what we perceive to be some common misunderstandings around its application. Two specific questions arise with surprising regularity among colleagues and students when interpreting and reporting AIC model tables. The first is related to the issue of ‘pretending’ variables, and specifically a muddled…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 67.74
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 21
Authors
6- CSChris SutherlandCorresponding
University of St Andrews
- DHDarragh Hare
Cornell University, University of Oxford, Louisiana Department of Natural Resources
- PJPaul J. Johnson
University of Oxford
- DWDaniel W. Linden
NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Science Center
- RARobert A. Montgomery
University of Oxford
Topics & keywords
- Akaike information criterion
- Intuition
- Selection (genetic algorithm)
- Model selection
- Complement (music)
- Information Criteria
- Computer science
- Advice (programming)