A large-scale comparison of human-written versus ChatGPT-generated essays
Indexed incrossrefdoajpubmed
Abstract
ChatGPT and similar generative AI models have attracted hundreds of millions of users and have become part of the public discourse. Many believe that such models will disrupt society and lead to significant changes in the education system and information generation. So far, this belief is based on either colloquial evidence or benchmarks from the owners of the models-both lack scientific rigor. We systematically assess the quality of AI-generated content through a large-scale study comparing human-written versus ChatGPT-generated argumentative student essays. We use essays that were rated by a large number of human experts (teachers). We augment the analysis by considering a set of linguistic characteristics…
Citation impact
299
total citations
- FWCI
- 49.26
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 37
Citations per year
Authors
5Topics & keywords
Topics
Keywords
- Argumentative
- Computer science
- Set (abstract data type)
- Quality (philosophy)
- Scale (ratio)
- Generative grammar
- Style (visual arts)
- Artificial intelligence
UN Sustainable Development Goals
- Quality Education
No related works found for this paper.