Illusory generalizability of clinical prediction models
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene · Yale University · +7 more institutions
Abstract
It is widely hoped that statistical models can improve decision-making related to medical treatments. Because of the cost and scarcity of medical outcomes data, this hope is typically based on investigators observing a model's success in one or two datasets or clinical contexts. We scrutinized this optimism by examining how well a machine learning model performed across several independent clinical trials of antipsychotic medication for schizophrenia. Models predicted patient outcomes with high accuracy within the trial in which the model was developed but performed no better than chance when applied out-of-sample. Pooling data across trials to predict outcomes in the trial left out did not improve…
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 75.47
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 37
Authors
12- AMAdam M. ChekroudCorresponding
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Yale University
- MHMatt Hawrilenko
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
- HLHieronimus Loho
Yale University
- JBJulia Bondar
New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
- RGRalitza Gueorguieva
Yale University
Topics & keywords
- Generalizability theory
- Pooling
- Optimism
- Context (archaeology)
- Clinical trial
- Sample size determination
- Psychology
- Machine learning
- Peace, Justice and strong institutions