METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS): a quality scoring tool for radiomics research endorsed by EuSoMII
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · İstanbul Başakşehir Çam ve Sakura Şehir Hastanesi · +92 more institutions
Abstract
We conducted an online modified Delphi study with a group of international experts. It was performed in three consecutive stages: Stage#1, item preparation; Stage#2, panel discussion among EuSoMII Auditing Group members to identify the items to be voted; and Stage#3, four rounds of the modified Delphi exercise by panelists to determine the items eligible for the METRICS and their weights. The consensus threshold was 75%. Based on the median ranks derived from expert panel opinion and their rank-sum based conversion to importance scores, the category and item weights were calculated. RESULT: In total, 59 panelists from 19 countries participated in selection and ranking of the items and categories. Final METRICS tool included 30 items within 9 categories. According to their weights, the categories were in descending order of importance: study design, imaging data, image processing and feature extraction, metrics and comparison, testing, feature processing, preparation for modeling, segmentation, and open science. A web application and a repository were developed to streamline the calculation of the METRICS score and to collect feedback from the radiomics community.
In this work, we developed a scoring tool for assessing the methodological quality of the radiomics research, with a large international panel and a modified Delphi protocol. With its conditional format to cover methodological variations, it provides a well-constructed framework for the key methodological concepts to assess the quality of radiomic research papers. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A quality assessment tool, METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS), is made available by a large group of international domain experts, with transparent methodology, aiming at evaluating and improving research quality in radiomics and machine learning. KEY POINTS: • A methodological scoring tool, METRICS, was developed for assessing the quality of radiomics research, with a large international expert panel and a modified Delphi protocol. • The proposed scoring tool presents expert opinion-based importance weights of categories and items with a transparent methodology for the first time. • METRICS accounts for varying use cases, from handcrafted radiomics to entirely deep learning-based pipelines. • A web application has been developed to help with the calculation of the METRICS score ( https://metricsscore.github.io/metrics/METRICS.html ) and a repository created to collect feedback from the radiomics community ( https://github.com/metricsscore/metrics ).
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 97.82
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 44
Authors
60- BKBurak Koçak
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, İstanbul Başakşehir Çam ve Sakura Şehir Hastanesi
- TATugba Akinci D’AntonoliCorresponding
Psychiatry Baselland
- NDNathaniel D. Mercaldo
Massachusetts General Hospital
- ÁAÁngel Alberich‐Bayarri
Center For Biomarker Research In Medicine
- BBBettina Baeßler
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
Topics & keywords
- Radiomics
- Medicine
- Neuroradiology
- Medical physics
- Quality Score
- Quality (philosophy)
- Interventional radiology
- Radiology