articleNew England Journal of MedicineFeb 28, 2024GREEN OA

Simple versus Radical Hysterectomy in Women with Low-Risk Cervical Cancer

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Background

Retrospective data suggest that the incidence of parametrial infiltration is low in patients with early-stage low-risk cervical cancer, which raises questions regarding the need for radical hysterectomy in these patients. However, data from large, randomized trials comparing outcomes of radical and simple hysterectomy are lacking.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial comparing radical hysterectomy with simple hysterectomy including lymph-node assessment in patients with low-risk cervical cancer (lesions of ≤2 cm with limited stromal invasion). The primary outcome was cancer recurrence in the pelvic area (pelvic recurrence) at 3 years. The prespecified noninferiority margin for the between-group difference in pelvic recurrence at 3 years was 4 percentage points.

No related works found for this paper.

Funding