Simple versus Radical Hysterectomy in Women with Low-Risk Cervical Cancer
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Abstract
Retrospective data suggest that the incidence of parametrial infiltration is low in patients with early-stage low-risk cervical cancer, which raises questions regarding the need for radical hysterectomy in these patients. However, data from large, randomized trials comparing outcomes of radical and simple hysterectomy are lacking.
We conducted a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial comparing radical hysterectomy with simple hysterectomy including lymph-node assessment in patients with low-risk cervical cancer (lesions of ≤2 cm with limited stromal invasion). The primary outcome was cancer recurrence in the pelvic area (pelvic recurrence) at 3 years. The prespecified noninferiority margin for the between-group difference in pelvic recurrence at 3 years was 4 percentage points.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 121.89
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 27
Authors
20- MPMarie PlanteCorresponding
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
- JSJanice S. Kwon
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
- SESarah E. Ferguson
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
- VSVanessa Samouëlian
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
- GFGwénaël Ferron
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Cervical cancer
- Hysterectomy
- Radical Hysterectomy
- Confidence interval
- Incidence (geometry)
- Randomized controlled trial
- Randomization
- Good health and well-being