articleJAMAMar 9, 2024GREEN OA

Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon vs Uncoated Balloon for Coronary In-Stent Restenosis

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · St. Francis Hospital · +26 more institutions

PubMed
Indexed incrossrefpubmed

Abstract

Importance

Drug-coated balloons offer a potentially beneficial treatment strategy for the management of coronary in-stent restenosis. However, none have been previously evaluated or approved for use in coronary circulation in the United States.

Objective

To evaluate whether a paclitaxel-coated balloon is superior to an uncoated balloon in patients with in-stent restenosis undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Design, Setting, and Participants: AGENT IDE, a multicenter randomized clinical trial, enrolled 600 patients with in-stent restenosis (lesion length 2.0 mm to ≤4.0 mm) at 40 centers across the United States between May 2021 and August 2022. One-year clinical follow-up was completed on October 2, 2023. Interventions: Participants were randomized in a 2:1 allocation to undergo treatment with a paclitaxel-coated (n = 406) or an uncoated (n = 194) balloon. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point of 1-year target lesion failure-defined as the composite of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or cardiac death-was tested for superiority.

Citation impact

126
total citations
FWCI
64.54
Percentile
100%
References
26
Citations per year

Authors

66

Topics & keywords

Keywords
  • Medicine
  • Restenosis
  • Target lesion
  • Balloon
  • Hazard ratio
  • Stent
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Clinical endpoint
UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Good health and well-being
No related works found for this paper.