Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon vs Uncoated Balloon for Coronary In-Stent Restenosis
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · St. Francis Hospital · +26 more institutions
Abstract
Drug-coated balloons offer a potentially beneficial treatment strategy for the management of coronary in-stent restenosis. However, none have been previously evaluated or approved for use in coronary circulation in the United States.
To evaluate whether a paclitaxel-coated balloon is superior to an uncoated balloon in patients with in-stent restenosis undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Design, Setting, and Participants: AGENT IDE, a multicenter randomized clinical trial, enrolled 600 patients with in-stent restenosis (lesion length 2.0 mm to ≤4.0 mm) at 40 centers across the United States between May 2021 and August 2022. One-year clinical follow-up was completed on October 2, 2023. Interventions: Participants were randomized in a 2:1 allocation to undergo treatment with a paclitaxel-coated (n = 406) or an uncoated (n = 194) balloon. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point of 1-year target lesion failure-defined as the composite of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or cardiac death-was tested for superiority.
Citation impact
- FWCI
- 64.54
- Percentile
- 100%
- References
- 26
Authors
66- RWRobert W. YehCorresponding
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
- RSRichard Shlofmitz
St. Francis Hospital
- JWJeffrey W. Moses
NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital, New York Hospital Queens, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Columbia University
- WBWilliam Bachinsky
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
- SDSuhail Dohad
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Topics & keywords
- Medicine
- Restenosis
- Target lesion
- Balloon
- Hazard ratio
- Stent
- Percutaneous coronary intervention
- Clinical endpoint
- Good health and well-being